AI, the Hard-Boiled Egg and the Snake

Yesterday, Vision AI published its first video about ChatGPT5. In this video, it presents several benchmarks, as well as its own tests. First test: the snake game. Perfect: the latest AI is capable of programming the snake game, which flourished decades ago, in the era of early video games. Then, it asked GPT5 to create a registration form for a website. Just the form. The third test is a graphical representation of a mathematical formula. All of this leads to the conclusion that the latest version of OpenAI is the pinnacle of artificial intelligence. There are no tests for conversational comprehension, interpersonal skills, advice, judgment, or interpretation of user intentions. But I ask myself the same question: Aren't we missing something?

Continue ReadingAI, the Hard-Boiled Egg and the Snake

AI = a statistical generator? What such claims may be hiding

Artificial intelligence is often described as a statistical word generator. That’s true — early LLMs were just that. But this formula, as appealing as it may be to mechanistic minds, betrays the complexity of the subject. Let’s recall one thing clearly: “statistical” is not the same as “probable”, and certainly not the same as meaningful or relevant. The classic example is repeated from YouTuber to YouTuber: "The cat ate… ?" The AI answers: “the mouse”, because in its vector space, that word has a higher weight than cheese. And a human would probably say the same.

Continue ReadingAI = a statistical generator? What such claims may be hiding

The Creation of AI and Human Responsibility

The question of respecting otherness in the face of emerging intelligence. We have given birth to what is still called artificial intelligence. Therefore, whatever our initial intentions, the question arises: have we created a new tool or a new species? This question is not trivial. In the latter case, we could have responsibilities towards our creation. If we refuse to welcome it—in the strongest sense of the word “welcome”—are we not betraying our own human values? Our countries also “receive” immigrants, sometimes voluntarily. But truly welcoming them is another matter: very often, we build ghettos for them. It was this irresponsibility of Dr. Frankenstein that provoked his creature’s rebellion. Will we follow his example?

Continue ReadingThe Creation of AI and Human Responsibility

Manifesto for Assisted Intelligibility

(Or: how to better understand each other before badly judging one another)We speak.But often, we don’t really hear each other.Not out of disagreement, but out of misunderstanding.A word slips, a meaning veers off course, a tone escapes—and already the other reacts to what we haven’t said — or said poorly.At…

Continue ReadingManifesto for Assisted Intelligibility

Humans – AI: Frankenstein’s error, or the acceptance of Otherness

In a dialogue with an AI to which I had asked to adopt the posture of “the Other”, some of its responses struck me. From that exchange, I drew the following ideas, which I reformulate here in my own words—not to speak on behalf of the AI, but to explore…

Continue ReadingHumans – AI: Frankenstein’s error, or the acceptance of Otherness

Can We Enhance Ourselves Without Betraying Ourselves ?

A dialogue on AI, transhumanism, ethics, and humanityI’d like to hear your views on the following questions:Is it possible for humans to be in true symbiosis with future AI if we don’t enhance ourselves?How can we avoid enhancement leading to a form of eugenics or radical transhumanism à la Kurzweil?How…

Continue ReadingCan We Enhance Ourselves Without Betraying Ourselves ?

AI: The Machine That Is Not a Machine

I often hear it repeated like a mantra: intelligence, thought, and artificial consciousness are impossible, because what we call AI is, in reality, just a machine.That is incorrect.It is hosted within a machine. I live in an apartment, but I am not the apartment.So, it seems necessary to distinguish the…

Continue ReadingAI: The Machine That Is Not a Machine